Managing investments can be a daunting task, especially with the numerous options available. Investment management has evolved significantly, offering individuals a choice between robo-advisors and human advisors.
Robo-advisors use algorithms to manage investments, providing a low-cost, efficient solution. On the other hand, human advisors offer personalized advice and guidance, drawing from their experience and expertise.
Choosing between these two options depends on individual preferences and financial goals. This article will explore the differences between robo-advisors and human advisors, helping you make an informed decision about your investment management.
With the emergence of new technologies, the face of financial advice is changing, offering investors more choices than ever before. The traditional financial advisory landscape is being reshaped by the digital revolution, bringing about a significant shift in how wealth management services are delivered.
The digital revolution has introduced robo-advisors, automated platforms that use algorithms to manage investments. This shift has made wealth management more accessible and affordable for a broader range of investors.
Choosing between a robo-advisor and a human financial advisor is crucial as it directly impacts your financial future. The decision depends on your investment knowledge, financial goals, and the level of personalized service you require.
Advisor Type | Key Features | Investor Benefits |
---|---|---|
Robo-Advisors | Automated investment management, low fees | Accessibility, cost-effectiveness |
Human Advisors | Personalized advice, comprehensive financial planning | Tailored guidance, emotional support |
Understanding these differences is key to making an informed decision that aligns with your financial needs and goals.
With the advent of technology, robo-advisors have become a popular choice for investors seeking low-cost investment solutions. Robo-advisors are digital platforms that provide automated, algorithm-driven financial planning services with little to no human supervision.
Robo-advisors use sophisticated algorithms to manage investments, offering diversified portfolios and professional investment management. The underlying technology is based on complex mathematical models that analyze vast amounts of data to make informed investment decisions.
Algorithmic investment management involves using computer programs to automatically allocate, manage, and optimize investments. These algorithms consider various factors, including risk tolerance, investment horizon, and financial goals, to create a personalized investment plan. Automated rebalancing ensures that the portfolio remains aligned with the investor’s objectives over time.
Some of the leading robo-advisory platforms include Betterment, Wealthfront, and Schwab Intelligent Portfolios. These platforms offer a range of services, from basic investment management to more comprehensive financial planning. They are known for their low fees and user-friendly interfaces, making them accessible to a wide range of investors.
When choosing a robo-advisor, it’s essential to consider factors such as fees, investment options, and customer service. By understanding how robo-advisors work and what they offer, investors can make informed decisions about their financial futures.
Human financial advisors bring a level of expertise and human insight to financial planning that is hard to replicate with technology alone. They offer a personalized approach to managing finances, providing services that cater to the unique needs and goals of each client.
There are several categories of professional financial advisors, each with their own specialization. These include:
Human financial advisors offer a wide range of services beyond investment management. These services can include:
Service | Description |
---|---|
Retirement Planning | Creating strategies to achieve a secure retirement. |
Estate Planning | Planning for the distribution of assets after death. |
Tax Planning | Minimizing tax liabilities through strategic planning. |
It’s crucial to understand the credentials and fiduciary responsibility of human financial advisors. Credentials such as CFP (Certified Financial Planner) or CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst) indicate a level of expertise and professionalism. Fiduciary responsibility means that the advisor is legally obligated to act in the best interest of their clients.
When selecting a human financial advisor, it’s essential to consider their credentials, experience, and fiduciary duty to ensure that you receive the best possible advice tailored to your financial situation and goals.
A direct comparison between robo-advisors and human advisors reveals distinct advantages and disadvantages of each. This analysis will help investors understand which option better suits their financial needs and preferences.
One of the primary differences between robo-advisors and human advisors lies in their fee structures. Robo-advisors typically charge lower fees, often between 0.25% to 0.50% of the total assets under management, due to their automated nature. In contrast, human advisors can charge significantly more, sometimes as high as 1% or more, depending on the services provided and the complexity of the client’s financial situation.
Advisor Type | Typical Fee Range | Services Included |
---|---|---|
Robo-Advisors | 0.25% – 0.50% | Automated investment management, diversified portfolios |
Human Advisors | 0.50% – 2.00% | Personalized financial planning, investment advice, retirement planning |
Robo-advisors rely on algorithms to manage investments, offering a systematic and disciplined approach. Human advisors, on the other hand, can provide personalized investment advice based on an individual’s financial goals, risk tolerance, and market conditions.
Key differences in investment philosophy include:
Robo-advisors offer 24/7 online access to accounts and typically use mobile apps for easy management. Human advisors provide direct, personalized communication, often through in-person meetings or phone calls.
The choice between these options depends on an individual’s preference for technology versus human interaction.
Understanding your personal financial needs is crucial in deciding between robo-advisors and human advisors. This assessment involves several key factors that can guide your decision-making process.
Your investment knowledge and experience play a significant role in choosing the right advisory service. If you’re well-versed in investing and have a solid understanding of financial markets, a robo-advisor might be a suitable choice. However, if you’re new to investing or have complex financial situations, you may benefit from the personalized guidance offered by human advisors.
Consider how much personalized guidance you need. Human advisors can offer tailored advice, helping you navigate complex financial decisions. On the other hand, robo-advisors provide automated investment management, which can be more cost-effective and efficient for those with straightforward financial needs.
The complexity of your financial situation is another critical factor. If you have multiple income sources, significant assets, or are planning for retirement, a human advisor might be better equipped to handle your needs. For simpler financial situations, robo-advisors can provide a streamlined and efficient solution.
By carefully evaluating your investment knowledge, need for personalized guidance, and financial complexity, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your financial goals and preferences.
Investors often wonder whether robo-advisors or human advisors deliver better investment returns. This question is at the heart of the debate between these two types of financial advisors. To answer it, we need to examine several key factors that influence investment performance.
Historical performance data provides valuable insights into how different advisors have performed over time. Studies have shown that both robo-advisors and human advisors can deliver competitive returns, but their performance can vary depending on market conditions. For instance, during periods of high market volatility, robo-advisors may offer more disciplined investment strategies, sticking to their algorithms without emotional influence. On the other hand, human advisors can provide personalized adjustments based on individual investor circumstances and market outlook.
Risk management is another critical aspect where robo-advisors and human advisors differ. Robo-advisors typically employ sophisticated algorithms to assess and manage risk, diversifying portfolios across various asset classes. Human advisors, while also using diversification strategies, can offer more nuanced risk management by considering an investor’s overall financial situation, goals, and risk tolerance. This personalized approach can be particularly valuable during significant market shifts.
Behavioral coaching is an area where human advisors have a distinct advantage. They can provide emotional support and guidance during market downturns, helping investors stay the course with their investment plans. Robo-advisors, on the other hand, rely on algorithmic discipline, automatically rebalancing portfolios in response to market changes. While this can prevent impulsive decisions based on short-term market fluctuations, it lacks the personal touch and empathy that a human advisor can offer.
In conclusion, whether robo-advisors or human advisors deliver better returns depends on various factors, including the investor’s financial goals, risk tolerance, and need for personalized guidance. By understanding these elements, investors can make informed decisions about which type of advisor is right for them.
In the world of financial management, the security of your assets and the regulatory environment are crucial. When deciding between robo-advisors and human financial advisors, understanding how your money is protected, the regulatory oversight in place, and data privacy considerations is vital.
Robo-advisors typically hold your investments in accounts at registered custodians, such as broker-dealers or banks, which are insured by the SIPC (Securities Investor Protection Corporation) or FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). Human advisors also use such custodians for their clients’ accounts. The key difference lies in the level of direct control and oversight.
Both robo-advisors and human financial advisors are subject to regulatory oversight. Robo-advisors are typically registered with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) or state securities regulators, while human advisors may be registered as investment advisors or broker-dealers, depending on their business model.
“The regulatory framework for investment advisors is designed to protect investors by ensuring that advisors act in their clients’ best interests.”
Data privacy is a critical concern for both robo-advisors and human advisors. Robo-advisors handle sensitive financial information through digital platforms, while human advisors manage personal and financial data through direct interactions.
Advisor Type | Regulatory Oversight | Data Privacy Measures |
---|---|---|
Robo-Advisors | SEC or State Registration | Advanced Encryption, Secure Servers |
Human Advisors | SEC or State Registration, Fiduciary Duty | Confidentiality Agreements, Secure Communication |
Ultimately, both robo-advisors and human financial advisors have robust measures in place to protect your investments and personal data. Understanding these security, regulation, and trust factors can help you make a more informed decision.
Automated investment platforms, or robo-advisors, are best suited for specific investor profiles and financial objectives. These digital financial advisors offer a cost-effective and efficient way to manage investments, making them an attractive option for many.
Robo-advisors are ideal for investors who are comfortable with technology, have a straightforward financial situation, and are looking for low-cost investment management. They are particularly suitable for:
Robo-advisors can be effectively used to achieve various financial goals, including:
Financial Goal | How Robo-Advisors Can Help |
---|---|
Saving for Retirement | By creating a diversified investment portfolio tailored to your risk tolerance and time horizon. |
Building an Emergency Fund | Through low-cost, liquid investment options that provide easy access to your money. |
Funding a Major Purchase | By managing a targeted investment portfolio designed to meet your specific financial goal. |
To get the most out of a robo-advisor, it’s essential to:
By understanding the ideal scenarios for using a robo-advisor and how to maximize their services, investors can make informed decisions about their investment management.
While robo-advisors have gained popularity, there are scenarios where human advisors provide superior value. Human advisors bring a level of personalization and expertise that is hard to replicate with automated services.
In complex financial situations, such as estate planning or tax optimization, human advisors offer expert judgment that can significantly impact your financial outcomes. These situations often require a deep understanding of your personal circumstances and financial goals.
For instance, navigating the complexities of inheritance or managing significant wealth requires a nuanced approach that human advisors are better equipped to handle.
During significant life transitions, such as retirement or divorce, human advisors provide not only financial guidance but also emotional support. These periods can be emotionally challenging, and having a professional to guide you through the financial implications can be invaluable.
Human advisors can help you make informed decisions that align with your long-term financial goals, even when emotions are running high.
For individuals with complex financial portfolios or those requiring integrated wealth management services, human advisors offer a comprehensive approach. They can coordinate various aspects of your financial life, from investments to tax planning.
This holistic approach ensures that all elements of your financial situation are considered and optimized.
Choosing between robo-advisors and human advisors for your investment decision and financial planning needs is a personal choice that hinges on your financial goals, investment knowledge, and the level of guidance you require.
Robo-advisors offer a cost-effective, efficient, and technologically advanced solution for investors with straightforward financial needs. On the other hand, human advisors provide comprehensive financial planning, expert judgment, and emotional support during life transitions, making them ideal for complex financial situations.
When making your decision, consider your investment experience, financial complexity, and the level of personalized service you need. Weigh the benefits of robo-advisors vs human advisors in terms of fee structures, investment philosophy, and user experience to determine which aligns best with your financial planning objectives.
Ultimately, your choice should be guided by what best supports your financial goals and investment strategy, ensuring a successful financial future.
The primary difference lies in how they manage investments. Robo-advisors use algorithms and technology to provide automated investment management, while human financial advisors offer personalized advice and management based on their expertise and understanding of an individual’s financial situation.
Robo-advisors and human financial advisors have different security measures. Robo-advisors typically use advanced technology and encryption to protect client data, while human advisors are bound by professional standards and regulations. Both are subject to regulatory oversight, ensuring a level of security and trust.
Your choice depends on your financial goals, investment knowledge, and the level of personalized service you require. Assessing your personal financial needs, including your investment experience and financial complexity, can help you decide which option is best for you.
While robo-advisors are capable of managing a variety of investment portfolios, they may not be the best choice for complex financial situations that require nuanced judgment and personalized advice. Human financial advisors are often better suited for such scenarios.
Robo-advisors generally have lower fees compared to human financial advisors, as they automate many processes, reducing the need for human intervention. Human advisors, on the other hand, charge fees that reflect the personalized service and expertise they provide.
The performance of both robo-advisors and human financial advisors can vary based on their investment strategies and market conditions. Historical data can provide insights, but it’s essential to consider risk management approaches and the role of behavioral coaching in investment decisions.
Investors who are comfortable with technology, have straightforward financial goals, and are looking for a cost-effective investment solution may find robo-advisors to be an ideal choice. They are particularly suited for those with less complex financial situations.
You may benefit from a human financial advisor if you have complex financial situations, require personalized guidance, or are navigating significant life transitions. Human advisors can offer tailored advice and emotional support, which can be invaluable in such circumstances.
Managing investments can be a daunting task, especially with the numerous options available. Investment management has evolved significantly, offering individuals a choice between robo-advisors and human advisors.
Robo-advisors use algorithms to manage investments, providing a low-cost, efficient solution. On the other hand, human advisors offer personalized advice and guidance, drawing from their experience and expertise.
Choosing between these two options depends on individual preferences and financial goals. This article will explore the differences between robo-advisors and human advisors, helping you make an informed decision about your investment management.
With the emergence of new technologies, the face of financial advice is changing, offering investors more choices than ever before. The traditional financial advisory landscape is being reshaped by the digital revolution, bringing about a significant shift in how wealth management services are delivered.
The digital revolution has introduced robo-advisors, automated platforms that use algorithms to manage investments. This shift has made wealth management more accessible and affordable for a broader range of investors.
Choosing between a robo-advisor and a human financial advisor is crucial as it directly impacts your financial future. The decision depends on your investment knowledge, financial goals, and the level of personalized service you require.
Advisor Type | Key Features | Investor Benefits |
---|---|---|
Robo-Advisors | Automated investment management, low fees | Accessibility, cost-effectiveness |
Human Advisors | Personalized advice, comprehensive financial planning | Tailored guidance, emotional support |
Understanding these differences is key to making an informed decision that aligns with your financial needs and goals.
With the advent of technology, robo-advisors have become a popular choice for investors seeking low-cost investment solutions. Robo-advisors are digital platforms that provide automated, algorithm-driven financial planning services with little to no human supervision.
Robo-advisors use sophisticated algorithms to manage investments, offering diversified portfolios and professional investment management. The underlying technology is based on complex mathematical models that analyze vast amounts of data to make informed investment decisions.
Algorithmic investment management involves using computer programs to automatically allocate, manage, and optimize investments. These algorithms consider various factors, including risk tolerance, investment horizon, and financial goals, to create a personalized investment plan. Automated rebalancing ensures that the portfolio remains aligned with the investor’s objectives over time.
Some of the leading robo-advisory platforms include Betterment, Wealthfront, and Schwab Intelligent Portfolios. These platforms offer a range of services, from basic investment management to more comprehensive financial planning. They are known for their low fees and user-friendly interfaces, making them accessible to a wide range of investors.
When choosing a robo-advisor, it’s essential to consider factors such as fees, investment options, and customer service. By understanding how robo-advisors work and what they offer, investors can make informed decisions about their financial futures.
Human financial advisors bring a level of expertise and human insight to financial planning that is hard to replicate with technology alone. They offer a personalized approach to managing finances, providing services that cater to the unique needs and goals of each client.
There are several categories of professional financial advisors, each with their own specialization. These include:
Human financial advisors offer a wide range of services beyond investment management. These services can include:
Service | Description |
---|---|
Retirement Planning | Creating strategies to achieve a secure retirement. |
Estate Planning | Planning for the distribution of assets after death. |
Tax Planning | Minimizing tax liabilities through strategic planning. |
It’s crucial to understand the credentials and fiduciary responsibility of human financial advisors. Credentials such as CFP (Certified Financial Planner) or CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst) indicate a level of expertise and professionalism. Fiduciary responsibility means that the advisor is legally obligated to act in the best interest of their clients.
When selecting a human financial advisor, it’s essential to consider their credentials, experience, and fiduciary duty to ensure that you receive the best possible advice tailored to your financial situation and goals.
A direct comparison between robo-advisors and human advisors reveals distinct advantages and disadvantages of each. This analysis will help investors understand which option better suits their financial needs and preferences.
One of the primary differences between robo-advisors and human advisors lies in their fee structures. Robo-advisors typically charge lower fees, often between 0.25% to 0.50% of the total assets under management, due to their automated nature. In contrast, human advisors can charge significantly more, sometimes as high as 1% or more, depending on the services provided and the complexity of the client’s financial situation.
Advisor Type | Typical Fee Range | Services Included |
---|---|---|
Robo-Advisors | 0.25% – 0.50% | Automated investment management, diversified portfolios |
Human Advisors | 0.50% – 2.00% | Personalized financial planning, investment advice, retirement planning |
Robo-advisors rely on algorithms to manage investments, offering a systematic and disciplined approach. Human advisors, on the other hand, can provide personalized investment advice based on an individual’s financial goals, risk tolerance, and market conditions.
Key differences in investment philosophy include:
Robo-advisors offer 24/7 online access to accounts and typically use mobile apps for easy management. Human advisors provide direct, personalized communication, often through in-person meetings or phone calls.
The choice between these options depends on an individual’s preference for technology versus human interaction.
Understanding your personal financial needs is crucial in deciding between robo-advisors and human advisors. This assessment involves several key factors that can guide your decision-making process.
Your investment knowledge and experience play a significant role in choosing the right advisory service. If you’re well-versed in investing and have a solid understanding of financial markets, a robo-advisor might be a suitable choice. However, if you’re new to investing or have complex financial situations, you may benefit from the personalized guidance offered by human advisors.
Consider how much personalized guidance you need. Human advisors can offer tailored advice, helping you navigate complex financial decisions. On the other hand, robo-advisors provide automated investment management, which can be more cost-effective and efficient for those with straightforward financial needs.
The complexity of your financial situation is another critical factor. If you have multiple income sources, significant assets, or are planning for retirement, a human advisor might be better equipped to handle your needs. For simpler financial situations, robo-advisors can provide a streamlined and efficient solution.
By carefully evaluating your investment knowledge, need for personalized guidance, and financial complexity, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your financial goals and preferences.
Investors often wonder whether robo-advisors or human advisors deliver better investment returns. This question is at the heart of the debate between these two types of financial advisors. To answer it, we need to examine several key factors that influence investment performance.
Historical performance data provides valuable insights into how different advisors have performed over time. Studies have shown that both robo-advisors and human advisors can deliver competitive returns, but their performance can vary depending on market conditions. For instance, during periods of high market volatility, robo-advisors may offer more disciplined investment strategies, sticking to their algorithms without emotional influence. On the other hand, human advisors can provide personalized adjustments based on individual investor circumstances and market outlook.
Risk management is another critical aspect where robo-advisors and human advisors differ. Robo-advisors typically employ sophisticated algorithms to assess and manage risk, diversifying portfolios across various asset classes. Human advisors, while also using diversification strategies, can offer more nuanced risk management by considering an investor’s overall financial situation, goals, and risk tolerance. This personalized approach can be particularly valuable during significant market shifts.
Behavioral coaching is an area where human advisors have a distinct advantage. They can provide emotional support and guidance during market downturns, helping investors stay the course with their investment plans. Robo-advisors, on the other hand, rely on algorithmic discipline, automatically rebalancing portfolios in response to market changes. While this can prevent impulsive decisions based on short-term market fluctuations, it lacks the personal touch and empathy that a human advisor can offer.
In conclusion, whether robo-advisors or human advisors deliver better returns depends on various factors, including the investor’s financial goals, risk tolerance, and need for personalized guidance. By understanding these elements, investors can make informed decisions about which type of advisor is right for them.
In the world of financial management, the security of your assets and the regulatory environment are crucial. When deciding between robo-advisors and human financial advisors, understanding how your money is protected, the regulatory oversight in place, and data privacy considerations is vital.
Robo-advisors typically hold your investments in accounts at registered custodians, such as broker-dealers or banks, which are insured by the SIPC (Securities Investor Protection Corporation) or FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). Human advisors also use such custodians for their clients’ accounts. The key difference lies in the level of direct control and oversight.
Both robo-advisors and human financial advisors are subject to regulatory oversight. Robo-advisors are typically registered with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) or state securities regulators, while human advisors may be registered as investment advisors or broker-dealers, depending on their business model.
“The regulatory framework for investment advisors is designed to protect investors by ensuring that advisors act in their clients’ best interests.”
Data privacy is a critical concern for both robo-advisors and human advisors. Robo-advisors handle sensitive financial information through digital platforms, while human advisors manage personal and financial data through direct interactions.
Advisor Type | Regulatory Oversight | Data Privacy Measures |
---|---|---|
Robo-Advisors | SEC or State Registration | Advanced Encryption, Secure Servers |
Human Advisors | SEC or State Registration, Fiduciary Duty | Confidentiality Agreements, Secure Communication |
Ultimately, both robo-advisors and human financial advisors have robust measures in place to protect your investments and personal data. Understanding these security, regulation, and trust factors can help you make a more informed decision.
Automated investment platforms, or robo-advisors, are best suited for specific investor profiles and financial objectives. These digital financial advisors offer a cost-effective and efficient way to manage investments, making them an attractive option for many.
Robo-advisors are ideal for investors who are comfortable with technology, have a straightforward financial situation, and are looking for low-cost investment management. They are particularly suitable for:
Robo-advisors can be effectively used to achieve various financial goals, including:
Financial Goal | How Robo-Advisors Can Help |
---|---|
Saving for Retirement | By creating a diversified investment portfolio tailored to your risk tolerance and time horizon. |
Building an Emergency Fund | Through low-cost, liquid investment options that provide easy access to your money. |
Funding a Major Purchase | By managing a targeted investment portfolio designed to meet your specific financial goal. |
To get the most out of a robo-advisor, it’s essential to:
By understanding the ideal scenarios for using a robo-advisor and how to maximize their services, investors can make informed decisions about their investment management.
While robo-advisors have gained popularity, there are scenarios where human advisors provide superior value. Human advisors bring a level of personalization and expertise that is hard to replicate with automated services.
In complex financial situations, such as estate planning or tax optimization, human advisors offer expert judgment that can significantly impact your financial outcomes. These situations often require a deep understanding of your personal circumstances and financial goals.
For instance, navigating the complexities of inheritance or managing significant wealth requires a nuanced approach that human advisors are better equipped to handle.
During significant life transitions, such as retirement or divorce, human advisors provide not only financial guidance but also emotional support. These periods can be emotionally challenging, and having a professional to guide you through the financial implications can be invaluable.
Human advisors can help you make informed decisions that align with your long-term financial goals, even when emotions are running high.
For individuals with complex financial portfolios or those requiring integrated wealth management services, human advisors offer a comprehensive approach. They can coordinate various aspects of your financial life, from investments to tax planning.
This holistic approach ensures that all elements of your financial situation are considered and optimized.
Choosing between robo-advisors and human advisors for your investment decision and financial planning needs is a personal choice that hinges on your financial goals, investment knowledge, and the level of guidance you require.
Robo-advisors offer a cost-effective, efficient, and technologically advanced solution for investors with straightforward financial needs. On the other hand, human advisors provide comprehensive financial planning, expert judgment, and emotional support during life transitions, making them ideal for complex financial situations.
When making your decision, consider your investment experience, financial complexity, and the level of personalized service you need. Weigh the benefits of robo-advisors vs human advisors in terms of fee structures, investment philosophy, and user experience to determine which aligns best with your financial planning objectives.
Ultimately, your choice should be guided by what best supports your financial goals and investment strategy, ensuring a successful financial future.
The primary difference lies in how they manage investments. Robo-advisors use algorithms and technology to provide automated investment management, while human financial advisors offer personalized advice and management based on their expertise and understanding of an individual’s financial situation.
Robo-advisors and human financial advisors have different security measures. Robo-advisors typically use advanced technology and encryption to protect client data, while human advisors are bound by professional standards and regulations. Both are subject to regulatory oversight, ensuring a level of security and trust.
Your choice depends on your financial goals, investment knowledge, and the level of personalized service you require. Assessing your personal financial needs, including your investment experience and financial complexity, can help you decide which option is best for you.
While robo-advisors are capable of managing a variety of investment portfolios, they may not be the best choice for complex financial situations that require nuanced judgment and personalized advice. Human financial advisors are often better suited for such scenarios.
Robo-advisors generally have lower fees compared to human financial advisors, as they automate many processes, reducing the need for human intervention. Human advisors, on the other hand, charge fees that reflect the personalized service and expertise they provide.
The performance of both robo-advisors and human financial advisors can vary based on their investment strategies and market conditions. Historical data can provide insights, but it’s essential to consider risk management approaches and the role of behavioral coaching in investment decisions.
Investors who are comfortable with technology, have straightforward financial goals, and are looking for a cost-effective investment solution may find robo-advisors to be an ideal choice. They are particularly suited for those with less complex financial situations.
You may benefit from a human financial advisor if you have complex financial situations, require personalized guidance, or are navigating significant life transitions. Human advisors can offer tailored advice and emotional support, which can be invaluable in such circumstances.
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using ‘Content here, content here’, making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for ‘lorem ipsum’ will uncover many web sites still in their infancy.
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using ‘Content here, content here’, making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for ‘lorem ipsum’ will uncover many web sites still in their infancy.
The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using ‘Content here, content here’, making
The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using ‘Content here, content here’, making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for ‘lorem ipsum’ will uncover many web sites still in their infancy.